Art reproductions play an important part in making your work more accessible. They open up new markets and income streams for artists which can be used to support the creation of your originals.
A high quality digital file is the key to high quality reproductions and having this process done to all the artworks you produce before you sell them can be the difference between making a living as an artist from your work or not.
There are two methods of producing a high quality digital file - direct scanning and photographic capture. In general, the direct scanning approach for art reproduction works well with moderate sized pieces (A2 to A1) - with those it can work very well, and be quite cost effective. However, for large pieces (those over A2/A1), the photographic approach can be a better way to create good quality files for digital reproduction.
The best way to find out the best approach for your work is to contact us and let us know what medium and size your work is, and ideally include some basic photographs of you work just so we can get a better idea of what we're dealing with. We'll be happy to guide you!
Direct scanning is a great way to create a high quality digital file
of smaller artworks but is generally not the ideal mechanism for
dealing with very large art works as it can be difficult to achieve perfect uniformity and focus using this approach with larger works. We tackle A2 works all the time, and indeed often up to A1 sizes, with excellent results.
The two types of works that tend to be hard to direct scan are large works and oils, particularly oils with heavy brushstrokes (impasto). These works reproduce best with a photographic approach.
scanners, such as plan scanners, touch the original works with rollers,
as they're more designed for documents and plans and have automatic
feed mechanisms. We've evaluated all the big players in the market
(Colortrac, Contex etc) and unfortunately they all visibly mark
delicate original works.
The Cruse scanner is the most heavily touted system and scans without touching the artwork surface. However we have often received scans of works made on these scanners and unfortunately they are often not sharp and they have always required significant colour work before final output.
We are not experts on this machine and they do generally have a good reputation but we can only judge based on the results we have seen. We have also seen a lot of negative commentary on the web in regards to their quality.
In our experience and testing, Photography simply works better than
scanning with very large works. It is one of the most colour accurate
techniques for art reproduction in general, and results in most
scenarios are very good. High resolution photography allows you to
properly light each piece individually for the best effect and most
accurate results - whether you want all the texture from the original
work, or a more flat reproduction. The artwork surface is never
touched, and it can in fact also be more cost effective, especially if
you have multiple pieces done at once.